Skip to main content

Response to: The United States Should Provide a Universal Health Care


The United States should provide a Universal Health Care by Alora Boot is an editorial that addresses an important issue in the United States.  Adopting a Universal Health Care System has been debated on for many years, but never come to fruition.   The author attached two articles with substantial evidence of how citizens and the government can both benefit from a Universal Health Care System.  One article points how other countries, some less wealthy than the United states, that have already adopted the universal health care system actually spend less per person than the United States.  In the other article the author attached, it states that many citizens file bankruptcy to survive drowning in debt from medical bills.  I agree with the author that our nation should adopt this type of healthcare system. 

Our government does not stand by its Preamble to the United States Constitution: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.  I believe a right to a universal healthcare system does and should fall under that preamble.  A government that is always declaring they are “for the people” sure do a poor job of exercising that especially when it comes to healthcare.

Health is unpredictable, and many health diagnoses such as cancers or organ transplants, etc. are very costly.  And like the author stated, “People should not be dying when there is a cure that they just can not afford.”  It is sad to think that people go bankrupt and or die because they can not afford health care to get proper treatment.  If our government was truly “For The People” healthcare would be a priority. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Voting is Vital! Make Election Day a national holiday. Why do we vote on a Tuesday? It is known that Election Day falls on a Tuesday to accommodate the farmers’ population lifestyle back in the mid 1800’s. Farmers had to travel far by horse and buggy from their rural land to the nearest city to vote. The weekends were designated for working on the farm and attending church. Monday was designated for the long travel and to rest before voting on Tuesday. Today Tuesday is not a convenient day to go vote. Now our country is urbanized, and the norm for an American lifestyle has become more hectic and harder to balance. So for some eligible voters, neglecting their responsibility of voting is easier than neglecting their everyday responsibilities in their life. Would more eligible voters make their civic duty of voting more of a priority if Election Day were made into a holiday? In the 2016 Presidential election voter turnout was at an all-time low. Voter apathy played a hug

Should Birth Control Be Free Preventative Care?

Should Birth Control Be Free Preventative Care? Whether or not birth control should be free and a part of preventative care has been a big debate.   Proponents of having birth control as preventative care state that not only does it prevent unplanned pregnancies, but even more it lowers health risks for women. Opponents of having birth control as a preventative care state that tax payers should not have to pay for another person’s healthcare. Does paying taxes really outweigh the health benefits a preventative care medication can provide?   In our nation it can and it does. It is a sad reality that it always comes down to money and not humanity.   The need for birth control coverage is necessary in the United States.   The National Health Statistics report that 62% of women in the United States with the reproductive age range of 15-44 use birth control as a form of preventative care to treat the many different conditions that can develop in a woman’s reproductive organs.   It is
  The editorial by the Houston Chronicle Where’s that Texan pride in the voting booth? argues that Texas residents lack pride, and lack a true understanding of the importance in voting, as the title may suggest.   It also suggests that Texas residents don’t show up to vote.   The writer’s argument is supported by evidence of recent statics by the University of Florida that have made apparent of the decrease number of voters in Texas due to voter apathy and demographics, such as ethnicity and age.   The voter apathy argument focuses on “statisticians ranked the Lone Star State among the worst in the nation in voter turnout.   Only 28 percent of the Texas voters participated in the 2014 general election.   Compare that to Maine, which led the country with 58 percent of its voters going to the poll.” The demographics such as age and ethnicity argument focuses on “a third of the state’s Hispanic population can’t vote because they are under age 18, compared to 20 percent of whites. Jus